Honestly, I’m fuckin loving ECC. I keep flopping about on second sub to run a long side it. I thought about PCC, EMPB, WDB Custom etc.
I’ve sat down, and thought what do I want more. After a long thought process, I’m going to run Raikov. Raikov covers a bunch of stuff which will work/amp CC such as:
The Fearless Experimentation Circuit The “No Gap Between Knowing and Doing” Mechanism Immediate Pattern Recognition Expansion Mastery Identity Integration Embodied Confidence of Mastery
Edit:
Dumbing phone down as a fuckin great choice, noticing I’m not on it as much today.
Here is from my journal, C&C seems to be pushing me to come back into action on chart even with my situation. It’s changing my mindset of “learned helplessness” (I’m not there yet, far from it, but I’ll say I was leaning toward this), or loser mindset to the mindset of someone who wants to take risk and make money. It’s doing that shift!
Now I need to refocus that mindset and be careful not to mix it up with greed. Strategy needs to overlap this winning mindset, and be carefully balanced so it doesn’t lean into greed.
He is also running more than the recommended titles (far more at times) and above the recommended usage. @JCDenton – you will need to disclose this when making reports if you are still using an experimental stack.
It could help you with the job. Might start finding out ways to move ahead. Management, possibly ownership of your own place. There are no limits with Adaptive Scripting so long as the person takes action – which is now easier than ever.
Technically, the features are the “goals,” but the titles are written in a manner where the individual chooses the expression – or whether it’s expressed at all. Moreso with the Adaptive Scripting. Honestly, everyone’s getting the first taste of what Zero Point Union will be like. The goal here is to further the ethos of the Zero Point Method – the individual having full control over the script’s expression and how they choose to integrate results into their lives. We stated two things about Zero Point Union:
For it to work properly, you would need to understand how Zero Point works.
That the end goal was to “get you off a particular title(s) when they no longer fit.”
While people were confused about what we meant, I suspect that those of you who have experienced C&C are starting to see how this vision would express.
For the first objective, reports like this were what we meant:
Yes – that’s why we wrote the copy this way. For us, copy is no longer just a way to sell a product. The copy itself becomes a transformational tool – a “mini-instruction manual” for each title. Customers can see exactly tools are being provided to them through the copy and choose when, where and how to express or utilize them.
The second goal is exactly what you’re experiencing. Through action, you’re now able to ascertain if the tools provided by the title are appropriate for your situation. Your self-analysis of immediate results becomes very important to growth. You can now choose to pivot or adjust quickly.
That being said, I would note that one should probably give a title around two weeks before making a final decision (if you can), because what we’re seeing right now is the same thing we always see: that immediate rush of results from a new title. Yes, with Adaptive Scripting, it is expressing differently (there’s more of an orientation toward action taking) – nonetheless, it is still that initial results push.
So, to summarize, the sub’s “goals” are the tools listed in the copy. The individual – through self-reflection and skill (literally, what you’re doing right now with these past few questions) – learns to consciously harness these tools, with the script supporting. Zero Point Union will be completely self-led. The subliminal is the tool – a useful tool, but a tool regardless. You’re the one who wields it.
@AnswerGroup With the new adaptive scripting, and how you’ve mentioned how good C&C is with other subs - how would C&C and RoW (“Wealth black”) work?
Even if there’s not so much archetype in this description I have a clear idea of C&C, but despite running RoW for a couple months, I don’t have as clear of an idea on that one.
So if the subs goals are essentially transformation and process oriented not external metrics, does the ‘tool’ orient around conscious stately goals or unconscious desires? Like is it enough to state and intend I want to have a certain networth/income and them C&C can orient around that?
It is difficult to say. With RoW – being part of the Unfolding / Revelation Series – potential results spread across a wide continuum. There are many who have run it without issue at all, others have struggled with it. Regardless, if you stack it with C&C, that Adaptive Scripting is going to help drive you toward action. It’s just a bit unpredictable about how that would express.
With C&C (and future titles), you’ll be able to see exactly how Adaptive Scripting expresses. Just look at the tools. But RoW is a different type of title, lol.
That may be contributing to my initial challenge on C&C -I’ve run ROW for 4 months and only did a mini washout.
You were spot on Saint, it was an awareness and process re-orientation that threw me for a loop. A day later with less recon, things are playing out very differently. Will post more later today on some clear new results
Between ROW and C&C which use case would you use if one were deciding bewteen them but the goals was life-transforming wealth starting in a 2 year time frame?
Sorry if I don’t remember this correctly, but I got the impression for what you wrote in the season 4 thread, that CC wasn’t very suited if one had a job with any type of wage ceiling ( in a way where it might not suit a CEO unless he/she also had a very large ownership stake in the company). When I read the product description and some answers here, I get the impression that this could work well for an ambitious employee, as long as the job/desired job matches the features of CC, and as long as there either is some opportunity to grow within the current organization or move to another one.
Is this someting that the adaptive scripting has changed, or did I just misread the original posts?
Definitely C&C. RoW is introspective, like the other Revelation titles. Best used during periods of downtime, solitude, etc. Times where you can go deep within the self and explore. C&C is more action oriented, with a “get it done” vibe. It’s better at the actual creation of wealth. RoW is better for this internal, possibly spiritual exploration of wealth.
No, you are correct. The best usage is within that context. What I was pointing out today is that it could still help you develop strategies within the current career (even if you consider it “dead end”) to advance your long-term goals. It is possible.
Now, let us be clear that if you are already in favorable circumstances, you will observe faster results that leads directly to wealth. But everyone will get SOME results with Adaptive Scripting.
And thank you again, so so much, for creating this and the other Unfolding and similar titles.
There is a significant (if often silent and a bit invisible) part of humanity that spends most of the time in the territory addressed by these titles. (And everyone dips into this territory sometimes; even if for some it’s only in dreams.)
For these people, even if a title like Ecstasy of Gold is played, the first strongest results will still be very similar to Revelation of Wealth-style connections.
I don’t know for sure, but, for starters, one way that the adaptive scripting may work (in relation to RoW) could be that you may start to notice yourself developing a somewhat clearer idea of RoW.
