Finding your sweet spot

Questions and Comments
#1

I know there was a lot of explanation about finding your sweet spot but I’m wondering if it’s only about spotting that balance between getting good results and getting reconciliation. Maybe there’s stonewalling involved in it too. So maybe sometimes it’s rather about finding the balance between getting results and stonewalling. I’ve got reconciliation only twice (on StarkT - too many loops, and on Q - too many subs) but sometimes I have an impression I’m stonewalling. I listened to 8 loops of KhanQ St3 for some time and didn’t see any results nor experienced I any reconciliation and only when I reduced the number of loops to 4 I started getting excellent results. The problem with stonewalling is you don’ t really know if it’s stonewalling or you just need more loops. If it’s stonewalling the general recommendation is to do the opposite - decrease the number of loops. When I was running 8 loops of Khan I could tell it was stonewalling and everybody would tell me the same taking into account the number of loops only. But what if you’re stonewalling running 3-4 loops only? You may think you have to increase the number of loops while the best course of action is to decrease that number.

Thank you for your insight, guys.

#2

I figure it’s probably best to start at one loop and increase as able while seeing results. Stonewalling on one loop seems unlikely (but would suck if that happens).

3 Likes
#3

This is probably the best advice and just like the Single Title article says, you should move up in loops when you feel comfortable.

The problem is that we tend to go on the higher side and then cut down to loops that are still too much For us.

I didn’t want to go less 4 loops so cutting down was difficult for me.

1 Like
#4

And you cut down the loops to what level, if I may know, please?

#5

I went from 4-6 loops down to one loop per sub. I’ve only just started this tho.

1 Like
#6

Sounds like a little revolution. I’m curious how it’ll go for you.

I must admit I started boldly with DR, I played two loops on the first day, two days ago, and last night I played four. I feel really good, no reconciliation but I don’t want to hit the wall. I assumed four loops is best for me since that was the case when running Khan but I’m aware of the fact every sub is different therefore our response differ too. I suppose I’ll have to stick to four loops for a while to be able to tell if it’s a good amount of loops for me.

#7

This is my issue and something I just changed because like you said, each sub is different. Start with 1-2 loops when you first start a new sub and go from there. Always start low first.

#8

The only problem is I don’t get reconciliation when playing 4-5 loops therefore I assume that’s the right amount of loops but what if I’m wrong and there’s stonewalling going on? Especially when it was said that you may not see acute results but there’s a deeper programing happening and the only difference between a low and a high number of loops is the processing time.

1 Like
#9

That’s why the recommendation is to start at 1 loop…go up a loop each day until you DO get reconciliation…then go back down to the next lowest number of loops from the on. THat’s your sweet spot. I think if you do that, stonewalling won’t really be an issue to worry about.

#10

I got the point but I didn’t have reconciliation even on 8 loops of KhanQ. The only two times I got reconciliation was when I was playing StarkT and only for some days then I felt as if I was under water, I was very calm and passive. The other time was when I added 2 loops of HoM to 1 loop of StarkT, 1 loop of AuraQ and 2 loops of CommanderU and only three days after doing it. Maybe if I had kept going I would have surpassed that reconciliation. I suppose I would have to run over 8 loops of Q to get any reconciliation. But I don’t even want to try I just want to avoid any possibility of stonewalling. The problem is it’s hard to spot if you’re stonewalling. I don’t want to sound as if I was a difficult kid, sorry. :slight_smile:

#11

You read where folks say start with one loop. I get Q is powerful but is it powerful enough to listen to one or two loops every day and get spectacular results without having to listen for years? Or should that not be a concern? If a person runs at the most two loops daily is time or days off still recommended?

1 Like
#12

According to the general recommendation which says 1-2 loops for a start it’s still recommendable to take two days off. But in some post @SaintSovereign mentions it’s fine to take a day of every four days (three days of listening, one day off).

That’s a very good question too.

1 Like