EXPERIMENTAL Microloop / ZPU Listening Instructions

[pakr93]

This listening pattern is much, much better for me than the “official” one.

I didn’t realize how much I was overloading myself, even with three minutes right from the start.
Recon is still there, even on a 30-second loop, but it does get resolved much faster.

I’m trying to understand how 30 seconds of listening can be so effective.
Years ago when I first came here, I would listen to subs for hours - so this is still mind-blowing for me.

[SoulFire]

@pakr93

I’m trying to understand how 30 seconds of listening can be so effective.

The only logical explanation is that they increased the amount of information delivered per second.

Which relates to another subject I think is important to know for users: the length of the script.

Listening to 1min Wanted Black and 1min Heartsong is a very different load/exposure level. (@SaintSovereign has mentioned one is a very long script and the other very short).

I have requested in the past that they give that information to help users customise further their subliminal experience.

I don’t see this info as anything secret or proprietary so I’m not sure why they haven’t done it yet, even if it’s only informally for forum members, make a simple rating of the sub density.

[Malkuth]

@pakr93

I’m trying to understand how 30 seconds of listening can be so effective.
Years ago when I first came here, I would listen to subs for hours - so this is still mind-blowing for me.

@SoulFire

The only logical explanation is that they increased the amount of information delivered per second.

Saint has already addressed this up above. And they will be addressing it further later.

Seems like things may have moved beyond analog logic.

See below:

@SaintSovereign

Do not overthink it, please. Please, everyone – lol don’t overthink it. There is another article coming explaining how microloops work, where we explain why you don’t need to jump ahead to get “the full script.” At the risk of causing more confusion, I will say that @emperor_obewan was the closest to get it right, stating that he believed the script was written in a fractal manner (or something of the sort).

There are four sections of the title, but the script itself is written in a recursive manner, meaning each part contains the whole. Every section covers the same topics and themes, but with different expressions. By “skipping ahead,” you’re actually harming your results, because there will be content that hasn’t been properly integrated and expressed, and you’ll slow yourself down. This is not a situation where a person needs to think “I can handle this,” and then overexpose. The advanced user – those who truly want to master a title – will work through the script with unwavering focus and skill, building a strong foundation that they can then later build upon with the later script.

[SoulFire]

The comments above are not related to the quote about ‘microloop/fullscript’ subject.

It’s nothing beyond logic here, there’s nothing esoteric about this technology, it’s based on language which is very much bound by time.

So to be as effective or more effective from hours of exposure to a few mins you either have to deliver the same info faster or with fewer words, which I’m guessing it’s a mix of both.

Higher output + smarter wording

[Judoka]

@SoulFire

It’s nothing beyond logic here, there’s nothing esoteric about this technology, it’s based on language which is very much bound by time.

I like this description of the subliminals,they really are tools you can use forever,the only ceiling is the language itself,if there really is a ceiling to the benefits/improvements

[Judoka]

The subconscious being told to get “richer” or “smarter” will probably continue doing just that even if its from a simple subliminal

[Fractal_Explorer]

The solace mask too. Giving the brain less to decode or separate probably helps as well.

[Malkuth]

@SoulFire

It’s nothing beyond logic here, there’s nothing esoteric about this technology, it’s based on language which is very much bound by time.

Yes.

But the ways that we structure language can vary tremendously.

I’m not suggesting esotericism. But I’m drawn to the term ‘fractal’. I’m guessing it’s partly metaphorical. But a fractal is a very real, physical object that nonetheless defies analog logic. (There are, of course, other varieties of logic.)

(By analog, I mean discrete, object-based, conventional ‘5-senses’-style, ‘shove the suitcase into the car trunk’-type thinking. Even an origami flower defies that logic.)

[SoulFire]

The fractal concept when it comes to these programs makes me think about the idea of layered audio, meaning that two or more sentences are played at the same time, I don’t know if that’s possible for the subconscious mind to absorb though, it sounds chaotic at least from a conscious mind perspective.

I find it more likely that fractal in this case means the way the subject matter is addressed in a non linear way throughout the track.

Unfortunately as interesting as this is, it’s in the territory of proprietary company tech.

I wish one day things change to an extent that these kinds of technical things can be shared openly, it’s a fascinating subject and I’m really curious.

[Tobyone]

@Malkuth

I was really craving them.

[ET32]

If I manage to be on 2 subs for 10m or full loop and I want to add the 3rd should I start the new one from 30s . Also what about the other subs?

[gdbdboy]

@SaintSovereign

As for multiple subs – the easiest way to handle this is to only progress with longer listening times once you’re not experiencing strong recon from the entire stack. It may be difficult to see which title is causing recon, so it’s best to continue the entire stack as “one single subliminal” in that they all interconnect, work together and operate as one – by design. So keep everything at the same exposure length until recon isn’t triggered as much (or not at all).

5 char

[SaintSpring]

@ET32

If I manage to be on 2 subs for 10m or full loop and I want to add the 3rd should I start the new one from 30s . Also what about the other subs?

Yes, because your experience with two first titles are not extrapolated on your experience with the third title. For example, you are doing good in maths and biology and have learned a lot by now. If you start studying chemistry, you’d probably start it from zero unless you studied it before.

[SaintSpring]

I may be asking a silly question, but with those new listening instructions, how to know when I am ready to build a custom subliminal title? Should we reach 15 minutes first, take some time and only then build a custom title?

@SaintSovereign @Fire

[ET32]

The 2 full loop tiyles should start again from 30 sec once i add the 3rd title?

[MAkh]

yes, starting again at 30s for each if doing this way

@SaintSovereign

What @gdbdboy said.

But once again, you MUST start over and work through the microloop strategy if you’re going to try this pattern. Please do not listen to all three at current listening lengths.

[Azriel]

Is this strategy the same for customs?

How does it work with multiple titles in a stack? @SaintSovereign

Thank you for any clarification.

[Adi]

I am on the 3th washout day after approximately an entire month of my stack, this always used to give me terrible reconciliation, now I can feel an upsurge of results flowing in, instead of before where it was a clash between the old and new reconciling over my reality. Now I have the necessary subconscious structures integrated to fall back on and the results can smoothly manifest itself, instead of going through the awful unnecessary reconciliation because nothing was properly integrated in my subconscious as yet.

This proves once again this new strategy is just much better. Only the beginning period is a bit difficult but once a certain amount of the script has been internalised and integrated then washouts or rest days become phases of profound results instead of reconciliation.

[Chase]

@SaintSovereign

@Prioritas

@SaintSovereign

@anon15812918

@SaintSovereign since you said that to use the sub for 30 active listening days you need to use microloops, does it mean that once you built up to full loop, you need to go back to original 26 day cycles?

And if that’s the case, how to go about having multiple subs in the stack? Like, for one sub you do 15 min, for another you are at 7, for example.

No, you would continue with this new schedule. Theoretically, if you have managed to reach a recon-less 15m loop, it would not bother you to use this schedule. But again, you must work your way up following the strategy. That means going back down when you experience recon. You can, of course, continue to use it at your “sweet spot” for as long as you want.

As for multiple subs – the easiest way to handle this is to only progress with longer listening times once you’re not experiencing strong recon from the entire stack. It may be difficult to see which title is causing recon, so it’s best to continue the entire stack as “one single subliminal” in that they all interconnect, work together and operate as one – by design. So keep everything at the same exposure length until recon isn’t triggered as much (or not at all).

Is this also advisable for customs?

Yes, you can use this strategy with customs.

5 characters

[Judoka]

I still think 21 days listening and 5 days washout is best as i notice most results in the washout