5char
2 Likes
5char
1 Like
5char
5char
5char
5 Likes
This is an interesting combo you running.
I want to run DRR myself but committing to RICH/EoG the rest of the year.
DRR from what I read from sales page and forum is a mix between “it’s a hard title” and “be prepared to get your ass kicked”.
So just outside looking in, it looks like you’re running a fun title(WB) with an ass kicking title(DRR) and a serious title(SB).
But it sounds like you’re able to make it flow/blend together.
5char
Ahh ok.
So I may run Khan in the future but looking over the sales page, it has the same ass kicking warning as DRR:
"Those who have ran Dragon Reborn know.
And yet, with Khan v2 we are taking TOTAL BREAKDOWN further.
TOTAL BREAKDOWN is exactly what it sounds."
However it is interesting that out of all the subs I see talked about here, Khan has the most positive reviews.
Did you get your ass kicked in KH1?
1 Like
5char
1 Like
This defiantly makes me want to run Khan. DRR seems like its very identical to Khan minus the sexual energy thing.
1 Like
5char
1 Like
5char
4 Likes
The term ‘dense’ is one of the most misused words (second only to ‘archetype,’ actually) on the forums. It doesn’t primarily relate to overloading your subconscious mind or being more prone to recon, as implied by that misuse. The entire tech is based on the quadrants I mentioned in the other thread (WB).
That term is outdated and should be replaced, as it refers to the array and amount of action required to support the script’s execution, which goes beyond your daily life. In this context, a ‘dense’ sub is one that isn’t strongly anchored in your current reality (your routines, habits, activities, circumstances, etc.) and requires significant mental and, often, physical effort that pushes you beyond your current reality. However, even in such cases, it’s not an issue for the quadrants I mentioned. Thanks to the quadrants, the sub is always aligned with your current reality, much like WB was. Even though you were stonewalling (not getting the desired results), you still got relevant results.
In light of what was said, I wouldn’t drop Khan for the reason you mentioned
especially since it’s providing you with momentum that you can build upon. Unless, you really think that the results you’re getting currently are not the right way for you.
Not at all. The only real similarity between both is that both titles are designed to help you take control of your life, rather than being a puppet swayed by every wind.
If it’s not recon speaking through you, feel free to experiment. However, it would be a pity if you lost the momentum instead of capitalizing on it.
3 Likes
5char
5char
It’s funny they’re concerned about someone who’s apparently doing great on this stack.
Anyhow, this topic is really advanced, therefore, its understanding is usually vague. Integration is not so much dependent on the “density” (the correct phrase here would be the complexity of the scripting’s execution in the average user) thanks to the quadrants. Quadrants are like levels. If you’re unable to execute Quadrant 1 to a certain degree, executing Quadrant 2 becomes almost impossible (apart from some less difficult to execute elements). That potentially causes recon pretty much every time in the form of stonewalling (I spoke about) and usually in other forms such as irritability, headaches, etc. In this case, Quadrant 2 and the ones above are ‘ignored’ by our subconscious when it comes to their execution and integration.
What most people fail to understand repeatedly is that execution and integration aren’t heavily dependent on the scripting itself, because of the quadrants, but on your ability to recognize the relevant action and your readiness to take it. The scripting matters only in terms of its content (what it’s supposed to do for you). Thanks to the quadrants the complexity of the scripting that gets processed by your subconsious, and therefore the difficulty of execution, is adjusted by the interaction between your subconscious mind and the scripting. In other words, your subconscious executes and integrates only what it’s ready for, while the rest gets ignored (perhaps temporarily)—and probably stored until it can be executed (we’ve seen many examples of people executing elements of past scripting they hadn’t fully processed before).
However, if you wanted to execute the entire scripting (all the quadrants), then yes, you might have a reason to be concerned about your ability to do so. But no one here seems to be worried about that. Why would they be, especially when the quadrants were developed to address just that? The bottom line is that everyone can run any title and execute it to some degree, and the whole ‘density’ talk is outdated. I understand why the founders still refer to it—they’re aware that the community hasn’t fully caught up with all the changes, and they need to use familiar (though outdated) terms like ‘archetype’ and ‘density’ to help people understand how to work with more advanced technology.
Actually, this whole explanation could have been avoided by simply telling you that everyone is different and reacts to the same scripting in their own way and the only valid way to know how the scripting works for you is by using it but I suppose that wouldn’t satisfy someone with as inquisitive a mind as yours.
Yes, it does, but that doesn’t mean the execution and integration will be the same for each. Running both can also create a unique synergy that works really well for you. From what you’ve written, it seems that’s the case
I answered that above.
4 Likes
5char
1 Like
5char
3 Likes
lllll vg
1 Like