(more chars)
Iām thinking tones and words have something to do with making chanting effective. Sort of like words impacting water molecules, and there is a lot of water in the body.
Probably also has something to do with intention. I think thatās how the water study worked, since I believe they tried it with different languages too.
Its a way to steady the mind. If you are relax you wonāt have a hard time in hitting the nail with the hammer. When you achieve this, it will be easier for the mind to accept the subs.
Synchronicity alert:
@BLACKICE Not sure if youāve already come across the work of Anthony Metivier. He brings a sophisticated but also a high-level adept perspective to this question. Apparently, he has a TED talk which I have not watched, but I am listening to him discuss his experiences and ideas with Guru Viking.
Just happened to be listening to this this morning as I repaired the toilet seat in our bathroom.
At around 12:38, they start to discuss potential neuroeffective properties of Sanskrit as a language/mental technology.
Here:
And hereās his TED Talk. Maybe Iāll listen later. (haha. listening now.)
I like the concept: PNSE: Persistent Non-Symbolic Experience
Bookmarked to watch, thanks!
One thing I would like to contribute to this cool little discussion (that seems Emperor Throne worthy, btw) isā¦
Attuning yourself to the master of that mantra (I call them calls, personally) is crucial to success with these forms of mantras.
Buddha, Shiva, Krishna are certain recognizable beings associated with some (Mol Mantra, for example).
The intent makes every bit of the difference for giving mantras. Giving, being very. Very operative.
You get what you put into them.
Now THATāS interesting. Iāve considered teaching myself Sanskrit and Punjabi, gonna return to this video.