For me this is a bit different. During the first few weeks I observe how I react to a new title in a stack. For years when something didn’t feel right I would always see it as recon and any attempt to alleviate that by changing a title without staying with it for 60-100 days as self-sabotage. Basically no pain, no gain.
This slowly eroded trust in my gut instinct to the point that I would always mistrust such impulses and thus my deeper self. To regain trust in my instincts and subconscious pings regarding mental development I did the opposite and decided to radically trust my gut, even if a decision turns out to be too hasty.
If, after changing to some different title, I realize that a former one was giving me results that I couldn’t appreciate or see at the time, I take notice and if the perceived benefits seem great enough I revisit that title. This fosters guilt- and shame-free experimentation and trust in myself.
Some fast stack changes are likely running away from change or a difficult topic, but other times titles simply don’t align with me even if the copy speaks to me. And while this process of radical self trust costs a certain amount of extra time, so does sticking with every title for ~60 days before allowing yourself to rotate it out in the long run.
It boils down to your preferred strategy of progress: deep trust in the nudges and pings from your deeper self which is very fluid and sometimes too hasty or constant wariness and distrust toward your subconscious mind which is more controlled but numbs you to your inner voice over time.
My approach nowadays is a combination of deep trust coupled with extensively reading and analyzing the copy of the titles I run or contemplate to run while watching my inner state closely. More observing and trying to communicate with my deeper self and less blind trust in rationality that drowns out inner talk.
.
