@mvargo i did an 8 min loop
Actual vision that I can see
3 Likes
Thank you so much for this upgrade 
7 Likes
Thanks for the update. Will have to keep pushing this one with Paragon and see if I can nix my glasses. Although it might be a little early to tell yet.
3 Likes
Netflix:
In this competition of intelligence, contestants face off in games of wit and strategy to be crowned winner and go home with the ultimate prize.
I can tell this is working - it’s a unique feeling.
Rather than feeling like I’m getting smarter, I’m feeling like life is getting simpler… or rather, it’s always been this simple, and I’m only just realizing it now.
The ideas I’m having, just tiny little ideas about how to make things a bit better, come to me easily, and immediately strike me as valuable ideas to implement.
Results from first loop of QLST1 are small but powerful, exactly as one would hope. It’s a really encouraging sign to keep going, makes me excited to give all 4 stages their time, if they keep providing value.
@SaintSovereign would you recommend one cycle per stage right now, or two?
23 Likes
Great question.
@SaintSovereign would love some insight on how many cycles of each stage you’d recommend running before committing to Stage 4
4 Likes
That is so cool to read.
1 Like
Can i stack EMP black(3 mins loop) with QLst4(3mins loop)bevause i want steady productivity or it will be too heavy to stack both?
I used emp black before ,though i had the drive but it failed at learning complicated mathematics and many other subjects(there wasnt much time left), i dont say it failed because it wasn’t built for that purpose anyway . I am thinking this new QL might solve the problem?? What you guys think ?
Is it okay to run an old custom with limitless core
And
The new quantum Limitless major program from stage 1 in the same cycle?
I am no expert but i think it might cause recon, because one title teaches your brain to adapt learning in an old way(ur custom) and the new title will encourage and teach you to learn in a new way(new Ql)
Or the new Ql is not a rewrite just addition of NLE , so it might not cause any recon and work alongside
1 Like
Would love to know this as well
1 Like
I mean, you can try out after one cycle of stages 1-3. I recommend doing each stage for one month (including stage 4), and then starting over. Keep doing this until recon is very little, or you’re getting great results. Then switch solely to stage 4.
15 Likes
This title after reading the new copy multiple times already has me so curious as to the possibilities and potential that a person can unleash within themselves.
3 Likes
I ran through all 4 stages in the qv2 days (1 cycle each) and I am planning to run through them again now with this new version, but I barely experience recon (on any title) ever since ZPV2 hit. Is recon the only barometer for progression on a title like Quantum Limitless? I was tempted to jump straight to stage 4 this time, but since I’m also running New Emperor I figured I’d go slow and start at stage 1 again.
I mean obviously I could test my intelligence with IQ tests or puzzle games and the like, but those wouldn’t help so much with deciding to move between stages.
2 Likes
Second loop of this earlier today. Running Emperor/QL solo. My experiences so far:
-
First off I am thinking much, much bigger. Posted more in my journal on this, but it takes the same amount of work to make 6 figures as it does 7 figures. As @Jouissance said I have been thinking of better ways to simplify my process, higher leverage opportunities, etc.
-
Have been finding different mentors in busines/sales/etc that have drastically expanded my thinking. The interesting part is some of these people have been teaching for years, subjects I consistently study, but I am just now finding out about them…
-
Thinking on longer time frames. No longer thinking about 1 month, 3 month, or 6 months from now where I want to be. When I think of the future, I think about becoming the person I can be 3 years from now. Slight change, but drastically shifted the scale on my visualization.
9 Likes
That’s a cool way of looking at it. I’d been occasionally using the old QLST4 prior to the recent drop and I tried ST1 when it came out.
Then last night I was rereading my journal from the beginning to try to get a better sense of when stuff started improving to the point where today suddenly I feel like things have dramatically simplified in writing the code, and I realized I kept reading and reading and expecting to see some linear progression, but by October I was like “wow! I was that far behind then?”
It seemed like, reading over the journal, it wasn’t till I was in end September / early October till things started picking up. But it kind of hit me afterwards that it was like a series of stages going gradually parabolic rather than a linear straight line.
And I’ve seen the “flashes of insight” thing. I think that seems to be one of the signatures of this newer ZP especially since the release of RoM around this month last year.
3 Likes
This is one of the reasons math fascinates me so much. To me it’s a short cut to better solution
3 Likes
Linear progression is one of the most common types of cognitive bias.
In reality, things almost never actually give linear progression. it’s exponential or logarithmic 90+% of the time.
Exponential curves are what everybody knows… you get no results at first and then your results blow up all at once. Like learning pick up… you get no girls for a long time, then you figure out whatever blocked you, and you start getting girls every week.
Logarithmic curves are way more interesting though, these are how you hack life. Logarithmic curves are things where you get massive results UP FRONT, and then as you stay consistent over the long haul, results slow down and stop being so explosive.
Exercise (muscle gain, at least) gets beginners results extremely quickly, and then it’s harder to make gains as an intermediate. You can learn the basics of any languagae and be conversational enough to be a self-sufficient traveler in that country with less than 15 hours of study. There’s a lot of research that 50 hours of meditation will permanently change your brain.
Tim Ferriss basically built his whole brand and content of his book saround finding things with logarithmic results curves. Logarithmic curves are usually called “hacks” and exponential curves are usually what people online yell at you to be more consistent with.
Easiest mental hack is to ask yourself “is this logarithmic or exponential” and just forget that linear even exists
17 Likes