Suggestions/Question about sub stack change (for better imagining my future, building concrete plans, and connecting with peers and alumni)

Questions and Comments
#21

Hi guys,
@RVconsultant, @Apollo, @Malkuth, @hyperbeam

Thank you for sharing your experiences, and opinions about the sub stack. I wanted to let you know that something came up, so I am dropping out from the program. (Still be taking the math class) Therefore, I am keeping my current stack.

Also, I ran two days with Stark and HOM added to the stack to see what it felt like. (Also, I didn’t know whether I’d get in or not.) It was interesting to feel the effect, and I will be updating it to my journal.

3 Likes
#22

The important thing is to look at your lifestyle, your personality, and your comments and to then choose the program that best helps you to make the next step(s).

Also, make sure you don’t run too many programs at the same time. (Unless you have a very strong commitment and reason for doing so.)

1 or 2 titles would be best.

(I haven’t gone back to re-read all of the posts in this thread, so I’m not sure what you’ve landed on as far as the final stack.)

2 Likes
#23

@Malkuth
I suppose I should explain this.

There were two reasons of adding Stark and HOM to the stack.

  1. Since I’ve pretty much only ran primarily cognitive boosting subs, I wanted to see what it would be like to add something else on the primarily QL driven stack. So do a short run, see and assess was my thought.

  2. Before I realized I was going to drop out from the program, I was doing a homework, which was about assessing your values. Since, I find that Stark and HOM is more aligned for my long term/life goal than QL (I think QL is good for current situation of being in school, and perhaps useful as an occasional booster or occasional rotational stack in the future.) I thought it may be good to run the program to help assess the values more correctly.

Either way, I am dropping out from the program (there’s a conflict, and because of this conflict, I think trying to pursue the program at this stage with the math course would be like trying to catch two rabbits at the same time, and that I would likely miss both. This is interesting, as this was the feeling I got when I ran the other two subs. Rather, I had these feelings prior to running the programs for the 2 days, but the thought/feeling got amplified much after adding the programs.), so there really is no reason to add HOM and Stark to my current stack. (The primary focus should be about obtaining and mastering math skills, so cognitive enhancement takes priority. Not as much focus on building concrete career plans or manifesting and building connections.)

I also agree with your point about running 1-2 programs. Although SubClub’s products are advertised and thought fast acting products, I am approaching with a long run in mind. Thus, I am going back to having 1 area of focus, cognitive boost.

I mentioned this in the journal, but I am going stick with my previous/current plan, so I will be starting QL stage 3 tomorrow. (I thought I wrote this in my previous post, but I realized I wasn’t specific enough.) Pretty much the same stack as I mentioned in the initial post of this thread, except changing to the stage 3.