That’s pretty cool: even the watermark is a positive suggestion.
1 Like
Or he may just be one of those people whose conscious hearing extends a bit further into the ultrasonic range than most.
I know I used to catch a word here and there on the older masked programs from Subclub and other producers. He might have something similar going on.
1 Like
Maybe this is just my way of looking at this but, I find it kinda neat that y’all are able to put this into there without there having been a bunch of reports from anyone talking about all of a sudden being fascinated by poetry.
You even said ‘please’ 
1 Like
It’s said at natural talking speed. It’s never going to generate any meaningful results. What makes basic affirmations effective when you say them to yourself is the fact that you’re actively dwelling on it and have a tendency to take action on whatever affirmations you’re repeating.
12 Likes
Wouldn’t a watermark safeguard have the same issues as anti-piracy script that have been pointed out?
Watermark is only to identify the origin of the file. The original purchaser details etc.
I don’t think it has any info in it to read poetry and the like. Saint was being funny there.
3 Likes
Rn I am dropping my poetry reading!
2 Likes
Oh damn it! I should have kept the illusion up for art’s sake.
1 Like
Unfortunately, now it is too late my friend, too late 
1 Like
2 Likes
1 Like
No, there’s a big distinction between a watermark safeguard and an anti-piracy script. A watermark, is designed to identify the origin of the file and the original producers details. Its purpose is not to affect the functioning of the subliminal but rather to trace its source.
On the other hand, an anti-privacy script, if used, could potentially involve manipulative tactics to guilt individuals into paying for the subliminal. For instance, it might create an emotional response by highlighting the benefits of the subliminal and then invoking feelings of guilt or obligation if the person hasn’t paid for it. This kind of script could target an individual’s emotions.
The key difference here is the intent and approach behind these two methods. A watermark is a means of identification, while an anti-piracy script could leverage emotional triggers to influence behavior. 
@Starman , I’m curious about the intentions behind your question.
2 Likes
No specific intentions, I just read Saints comment, and it sounded like a similar principle to anti-priracy script. And as pointed out that Is pointless as it would be ignored by the subconscious and just create resistance.
“Please do not attempt to decrypt and disassemble our patented technology. Please stop, enjoy, live and read poetry.”
But I am no expert on this topic, just a fellow user of Sub Club subliminals, no one elses. All of which I paid for via official means in case that is a concern. Neither do I plan to onsell or give to others.
I am also an active member of the forum. One who is not afraid to ask a question here and there even if it seems a challenge. I suppose after sub use and a shroom trip, I no more seek or require approval from others 
1 Like
These are warnings to “submakers” who take SubliminalClub audios and mix it with other subliminals on the Internet to produce and sell them as their own.
And that could lead to some serious legal action when found out. Not any serious subconcious issue when it comes to SubClub subliminals.
That is fine. You may ask any question you want. I wouldn’t say this question was challenging though. Maybe you refer to your questioning nature in general.
We have to remember though that the purpose of this forum isn’t to raise challenges but to record your self-growth and be inspired by those of others.
There are plenty of forums where challenges and debates are their very purposes and we don’t see much use in that.
One example being Reddit. It has its uses but most people misuse it and I doubt we want to turn the subresults forum into that.
That is also fine. Infact that is a very good thing. Seeking approval from others is a tiring task and it neither leads to said approval nor provide anything useful to the person doing it.
But whether you are a person who seeks approval or not, you will be treated the same.
2 Likes
Chuck Norris tested ZP2 for SC.
Sadly the ZP2 product suffered recon not him.
1 Like
Lol, but I think this belongs in the other thread.
Thank you Lion, you know I’m not here to cause trouble. I just feel some forum members are afraid to ask certain questions at times because there are fears it will be reacted to with all sorts of insinuations or accusations. But it appears most here are civilised and mature to approach in a reasonable and kind manner.
It is vital to all our growth that we do present challenges to one another in ways that are helpful, that stretch us, even if it seems a bit controversial or taboo to speak up on the subject.
Of course speculation run wild can have the opposite effect and I sure dont encourage that.
2 Likes
Your right i posted in the wrong thread 
1 Like
Don’t use the titles them.
Have you seen an outpouring of people reading poetry? No? Then stop acting like we don’t know what we’re doing.
1 Like