Back on topic, please. Wanted discussion can go in another thread.
2 Likes
quote=“SaintSovereign, post:45, topic:24818”]
Symmetry: Seductress is created with our “tools-based” framework in mind — one that serves as the foundation for the upcoming Zero Point Union format.
[/quote]
Is this framework similar to the build in Genesis: Art of Happiness & Joy? Or is it more like the new EOG build?
1 Like
The tools-based approach is used in both of those titles. So, if you’ve run either one, you can get an idea of the general “vibe” and feel.
5 Likes
About Symmetry: Seductress
The old Seductress gave off a somewhat of a “femme fatale” vibe, for lack of better words, following a familiar archetype found in many seduction/attraction subs. However after reading the updated copy it feels like the new version allows users to become their own unique seductress without being tied to a specific archetype. I’m curious if this is intentional or somewhat true
Also i am not against arcehtypes, i am simply noticing that i did not see one or possibly missed it
3 Likes
Thank you for your reply. Another question, I made a physical shifting custom that includes HOT & Spartan but it sounds like this has many other modules that are in my custom as well such as voice is law and enchantment. Would it be redundant to listen to both or would it enhance my custom? I’d rather add this with a wealth sub and perhaps SB in a long term stack.
2 Likes
I feel this too which is great since I relate to various archetypes. I also don’t fit into one box or category. I definitely got into reading dark seductress and dark feminine content when listening to seductress after a bit.
2 Likes
Seductress has physical scripting, but it’s nothing on the level of HoM, which is pretty much ALL physical scripting. And Spartan’s physical scripting is geared toward fitness and combat excellence. Technically, nothing is really redundant due to the fact that the outcomes are different.
As for Seductress itself, it’s probably best to do a few weeks solo to see if it feels redundant. I’m guessing “no,” however, since this has a rather tightly written script that operates as a whole. If you could handle the custom, Seductress and SB, that would be best, but that’s quite an undertaking.
6 Likes
Seductress and Stark Black are fantastic together.
I am curious to see how it’s going to work synergistically with the upgrade.
2 Likes
Sounds like seductress: symmetry is an all encompassing sub and I’d like to have a more focused stack. Thank you for your input. 
2 Likes
It was intentional. As you can see, there are vast differences in how the women here express their femininity, and given the fact that we’re just now starting to understand how to make women’s subs from a data-driven perspective, there aren’t a lot of “exclusive” archetypal choices for them. Logic dictated that the best way to approach this was to create the scripting more open-ended (in regards to archetypes) and focus instead on self-expression.
9 Likes
Description sounds wonderful! Art is beautiful as well
Maybe we could even get to see some new seductress journals soon
I was surprised at how many areas this title would touch upon : )
Sounds like a pretty OP new sub fr fr
4 Likes
Symmetry: Seductress is now available:
3 Likes