It’s funny they’re concerned about someone who’s apparently doing great on this stack.
Anyhow, this topic is really advanced, therefore, its understanding is usually vague. Integration is not so much dependent on the “density” (the correct phrase here would be the complexity of the scripting’s execution in the average user) thanks to the quadrants. Quadrants are like levels. If you’re unable to execute Quadrant 1 to a certain degree, executing Quadrant 2 becomes almost impossible (apart from some less difficult to execute elements). That potentially causes recon pretty much every time in the form of stonewalling (I spoke about) and usually in other forms such as irritability, headaches, etc. In this case, Quadrant 2 and the ones above are ‘ignored’ by our subconscious when it comes to their execution and integration.
What most people fail to understand repeatedly is that execution and integration aren’t heavily dependent on the scripting itself, because of the quadrants, but on your ability to recognize the relevant action and your readiness to take it. The scripting matters only in terms of its content (what it’s supposed to do for you). Thanks to the quadrants the complexity of the scripting that gets processed by your subconsious, and therefore the difficulty of execution, is adjusted by the interaction between your subconscious mind and the scripting. In other words, your subconscious executes and integrates only what it’s ready for, while the rest gets ignored (perhaps temporarily)—and probably stored until it can be executed (we’ve seen many examples of people executing elements of past scripting they hadn’t fully processed before).
However, if you wanted to execute the entire scripting (all the quadrants), then yes, you might have a reason to be concerned about your ability to do so. But no one here seems to be worried about that. Why would they be, especially when the quadrants were developed to address just that? The bottom line is that everyone can run any title and execute it to some degree, and the whole ‘density’ talk is outdated. I understand why the founders still refer to it—they’re aware that the community hasn’t fully caught up with all the changes, and they need to use familiar (though outdated) terms like ‘archetype’ and ‘density’ to help people understand how to work with more advanced technology.
Actually, this whole explanation could have been avoided by simply telling you that everyone is different and reacts to the same scripting in their own way and the only valid way to know how the scripting works for you is by using it but I suppose that wouldn’t satisfy someone with as inquisitive a mind as yours.
Yes, it does, but that doesn’t mean the execution and integration will be the same for each. Running both can also create a unique synergy that works really well for you. From what you’ve written, it seems that’s the case
I answered that above.
