For me It’s a super cleanser in general.
Thats why I recommended KHAN st 1
Its not for words, more for general cleansing
Afterwards go with Kahn Black st1, then Primal
For me It’s a super cleanser in general.
Thats why I recommended KHAN st 1
Its not for words, more for general cleansing
Afterwards go with Kahn Black st1, then Primal
This is a good question. Have you read about Ascension? Sanguine? Sanguine: The Elixir?
Sanguine: The Elixir is more focused on inner peace. I used Sanguine: The Elixir last year and found it useful for general healing, positivity and calmness.
The question here is related with sexual healing in terms of approaching women fearlessly.
You’ve hit on something really insightful there. It’s true that having a strong sexual aura can draw people in, but relying solely on that external validation can leave you feeling pretty shaky when it fades. It’s like building a house on sand.
Instead of focusing on having multiple “sexual auras” to attract others, maybe the real magic lies in building a solid sense of self from the inside out. When you’re genuinely confident and secure in who you are.
Khan 1
Primal
Which Primal?
Primal Romance?
Primal Seduction?
Primal Nights? or
Primal?
There’s only ONE Primal
Is there a specific mention of 18 in the script? I am asking because the age of consent can vary from 16-21 depending on country and region.
I believe Benny is referring to Primal.
Yes. Sorry, no exceptions. I have to defer to Western law on this one.
Just to clarify — do you mean the subliminal won’t affect someone under the age of 18 (in terms of becoming more attractive), or that it won’t attract women under 18?
As you know, age of consent laws vary from country to country, so I just want to make sure I understand your meaning correctly.
Both. But it’s going to remain 18+. No exceptions.
Hey man, thanks for the clarification — and I fully respect the 18+ policy for both legal and ethical reasons.
That said, I wanted to offer some context from real-world social dynamics, especially when it comes to status-building and perception.
In many countries — especially in parts of Europe and Latin America — it’s completely legal for 16–17-year-olds to work as hostesses, servers, or event staff in upscale clubs, restaurants, and lounges.
In those environments, a man’s social value is constantly being assessed — not just by his peers or date, but by everyone around. And in that setting, reactions from younger women — even unintentional IOIs or flirty energy — can actually boost a man’s perceived dominance, confidence, and preselection. It’s not about actively engaging them, but about how their attention affects social status.
So my question is:
Do titles like Khan, Primal, HOM, or Primal Seduction allow natural reactions from everyone in the environment, or is there a hard-coded block that suppresses attention from anyone under 18, even in harmless public interactions?
If so, could that scripting possibly cause awkward energetic mismatches or even IODs, especially in countries where such dynamics are both normal and legal?
Would love to understand how that part of the scripting works — especially since status and magnetism are often field-tested in settings where you can’t control who notices you.
Appreciate your time — and again, much respect for the work you guys are doing.
I understand that there are cultural differences. However, I do not feel inclined to go into great detail about how the scripting works on these topics because they have never been an issue before. No one has reported any problems with this before. That’s about as far as I’m willing to discuss on this topic.
18+
I’m not sure you do.
I’ll be straightforward—your response felt vague, defensive, and dismissive, almost as if you were trying to make me feel uncomfortable for even asking the question publicly.
I understand this could be a sensitive topic from a legal or PR standpoint, but the way it was shut down without providing genuine clarification or insight doesn’t feel respectful—especially considering I’m a paying customer seeking clarity on how these products function in real-world scenarios.
I wasn’t suggesting or implying anything unethical; my question was simply about how aura scripting behaves in everyday social environments, particularly where attention from women under 18 (legally and culturally acceptable in many regions) can significantly influence one’s perceived social status and confidence.
And which titles have that cap.
The response that “no one has ever mentioned this before” doesn’t address the actual concern.
Users might not always realize potential implications or know precisely what to ask until they encounter these situations.
Given the investment of time, energy, and finances into these products, dismissing legitimate inquiries in this manner leads me to question the depth of thought put into user experience and real-world applications.
Frankly, your reaction today makes me reconsider your products overall.
I’m a customer and deserve respect and transparency.
If you’re uncomfortable addressing certain aspects, that’s understandable—just clearly state that rather than making it seem like my concern is invalid or inappropriate.
This conversation is over.